COSMO TECHNOLOGIES
PharmaCOSMO TECHNOLOGIES is a pharmaceutical company focused on Oncology, Immunology, Gastroenterology. Key products include AEMCOLO.
FDA Novel Drug Designations
(2018)See 1 novel approval →
COSMO TECHNOLOGIES at a Glance
- Strong track record with 100% execution quality across 8 trials
- Fast trial execution (22 months median completion)
COSMO TECHNOLOGIES's Key Drugs
COSMO TECHNOLOGIES's key approved drugs from the last 15 years (excludes generics, biosimilars and IV formulations).
COSMO TECHNOLOGIES's Recent FDA Approvals
New NDA/BLA approvals for COSMO TECHNOLOGIES over the last two years — novel drugs only, excluding generics and label supplements.
COSMO TECHNOLOGIES's Therapeutic Areas
COSMO TECHNOLOGIES's approved drugs and pipeline span 3 therapeutic areas, led by Oncology and Immunology. Weighted by commercial stage — approved drugs count most, then late-stage trials.
COSMO TECHNOLOGIES's Top Competitors
COSMO TECHNOLOGIES's closest competitors by therapeutic-area and drug-target overlap include Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Takeda. Ranked by overlap in therapeutic areas and drug targets across approved drugs and pipeline.
COSMO TECHNOLOGIES Pipeline Snapshot
COSMO TECHNOLOGIES has 4 active clinical programs from ClinicalTrials.gov — 1 Phase 3, 3 Phase 2 and 0 Phase 1.
Pro Intelligence Preview
Deep insights for investors and analysts
Revenue Insights
- • Top drug revenue breakdown
- • Drug-level revenue analysis
Trial Catalysts
- • Oncology pipeline focus
- • Phase 3 readout tracking
Patent Risk
- • Patent expiration timeline
- • Revenue at risk analysis
Compare Companies
- • Side-by-side pipeline analysis
- • Revenue & market share comparison
Execution Intelligence
- • Phase 3: 2/2 completed
- • Speed: 22 months avg
Revenue forecasts • Trial milestones • Patent risk modeling
Active (0)
Discontinued (1)
Company Info
- First Approval
- 2018-11-16
- Latest
- 2019-07-12
- Applications
- 1
How We Calculate These Metrics
Execution Quality Score
Measures trial completion rates weighted by phase importance. Phase 3 trials count 4x more than Phase 1 because late-stage completion is harder and more valuable.
What counts as "completed": A trial that reached its planned endpoint and reported results. Trials that were terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted as completed—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.
- Excellent (80%+): Top-tier execution, most trials reach planned endpoints
- Good (60-79%): Strong execution with occasional early terminations
- Fair (40-59%): Average execution, notable rate of terminated/withdrawn trials
- Needs Improvement (under 40%): High termination rates, execution challenges