HONG KONG
PharmaHONG KONG is a pharmaceutical company focused on Respiratory, Dermatology, Oncology. Key products include XENLETA.
FDA Novel Drug Designations
(2019)See 1 novel approval →
HONG KONG at a Glance
- Growing R&D activity with 28 trials in last 2 years
HONG KONG's Key Drugs
HONG KONG's core commercial portfolio centers on XENLETA, spanning Respiratory and Dermatology — its most strategically important drugs approved in the last 15 years.
HONG KONG's Recent FDA Approvals
New NDA/BLA approvals for HONG KONG over the last two years — novel drugs only, excluding generics and label supplements.
HONG KONG's Therapeutic Areas
HONG KONG's approved drugs and pipeline span 5 therapeutic areas, led by Respiratory and Dermatology, across 0 biologic and 1 small-molecule drug. Weighted by commercial stage — approved drugs count most, then late-stage trials.
HONG KONG's Top Competitors
HONG KONG's closest competitors by therapeutic-area and drug-target overlap include Pfizer, GSK, and Novartis. Ranked by overlap in therapeutic areas and drug targets across approved drugs and pipeline.
HONG KONG Pipeline Snapshot
HONG KONG has 12 active clinical programs from ClinicalTrials.gov — 1 Phase 3, 4 Phase 2 and 7 Phase 1.
Pro Intelligence Preview
Deep insights for investors and analysts
Revenue Insights
- • XENLETA leads revenue
- • Drug-level revenue analysis
Trial Catalysts
- • Respiratory pipeline focus
- • Phase 3 readout tracking
Patent Risk
- • Patent expiration timeline
- • Revenue at risk analysis
Compare Companies
- • Side-by-side pipeline analysis
- • Revenue & market share comparison
Execution Intelligence
- • Phase 3: 19/31 completed
- • Speed: 40 months avg
Revenue forecasts • Trial milestones • Patent risk modeling
Active (1)
Discontinued (0)
Company Info
- First Approval
- 2004-07-28
- Latest
- 2022-07-06
- Applications
- 4
How We Calculate These Metrics
Execution Quality Score
Measures trial completion rates weighted by phase importance. Phase 3 trials count 4x more than Phase 1 because late-stage completion is harder and more valuable.
What counts as "completed": A trial that reached its planned endpoint and reported results. Trials that were terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted as completed—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.
- Excellent (80%+): Top-tier execution, most trials reach planned endpoints
- Good (60-79%): Strong execution with occasional early terminations
- Fair (40-59%): Average execution, notable rate of terminated/withdrawn trials
- Needs Improvement (under 40%): High termination rates, execution challenges