TheraRadar
← Back
Data updated: Jul 17, 2026

MCNEIL

Generics

MCNEIL is a generic drug manufacturer focused on Dermatology, Immunology, Infectious Disease.

1974
Since
5
Drugs
-
Trials
0
New Drugs (2yr)

MCNEIL at a Glance

  • Strong track record with 100% execution quality across 7 trials
  • Fast trial execution (6 months median completion)

MCNEIL's Key Drugs

MCNEIL's key approved drugs from the last 15 years (excludes generics, biosimilars and IV formulations).

No active drugs

MCNEIL's Recent FDA Approvals

New NDA/BLA approvals for MCNEIL over the last two years — novel drugs only, excluding generics and label supplements.

No recent approvals

MCNEIL's Therapeutic Areas

MCNEIL's approved drugs and pipeline span 3 therapeutic areas, led by Dermatology and Immunology. Weighted by commercial stage — approved drugs count most, then late-stage trials.

Dermatology 62%
0 drugs Phase 3: 2
Immunology 31%
0 drugs Phase 3: 1
Infectious Disease 8%
0 drugs Phase 1: 1

MCNEIL's Top Competitors

MCNEIL's closest competitors by therapeutic-area and drug-target overlap include Pfizer, BAUSCH AND LOMB INC, and APOTHECON. Ranked by overlap in therapeutic areas and drug targets across approved drugs and pipeline.

MCNEIL Pipeline Snapshot

MCNEIL has 4 active clinical programs from ClinicalTrials.gov — 3 Phase 3, 0 Phase 2 and 1 Phase 1.

3
Phase 3
0
Phase 2
1
Phase 1

Pro Intelligence Preview

Deep insights for investors and analysts

Revenue Insights

  • Top drug revenue breakdown
  • Drug-level revenue analysis

Trial Catalysts

  • Dermatology pipeline focus
  • Phase 3 readout tracking

Patent Risk

  • Patent expiration timeline
  • Revenue at risk analysis

Compare Companies

  • Side-by-side pipeline analysis
  • Revenue & market share comparison

Execution Intelligence

  • Phase 3: 3/3 completed
  • Speed: 6 months avg
Unlock Full Intelligence

Revenue forecasts • Trial milestones • Patent risk modeling

How We Calculate These Metrics

Execution Quality Score

Measures trial completion rates weighted by phase importance. Phase 3 trials count 4x more than Phase 1 because late-stage completion is harder and more valuable.

What counts as "completed": A trial that reached its planned endpoint and reported results. Trials that were terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted as completed—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.

  • Excellent (80%+): Top-tier execution, most trials reach planned endpoints
  • Good (60-79%): Strong execution with occasional early terminations
  • Fair (40-59%): Average execution, notable rate of terminated/withdrawn trials
  • Needs Improvement (under 40%): High termination rates, execution challenges