PACIFIC PHARMA
GenericsPACIFIC PHARMA is a generic drug manufacturer focused on Cardiovascular, Neurology.
PACIFIC PHARMA's Key Drugs
PACIFIC PHARMA's key approved drugs from the last 15 years (excludes generics, biosimilars and IV formulations).
PACIFIC PHARMA's Recent FDA Approvals
New NDA/BLA approvals for PACIFIC PHARMA over the last two years — novel drugs only, excluding generics and label supplements.
PACIFIC PHARMA's Therapeutic Areas
PACIFIC PHARMA's approved drugs and pipeline span 2 therapeutic areas, led by Cardiovascular and Neurology. Weighted by commercial stage — approved drugs count most, then late-stage trials.
PACIFIC PHARMA's Top Competitors
PACIFIC PHARMA's closest competitors by therapeutic-area and drug-target overlap include GE HEALTHCARE, Novo Nordisk, and LEDERLE. Ranked by overlap in therapeutic areas and drug targets across approved drugs and pipeline.
PACIFIC PHARMA Pipeline Snapshot
Active clinical trials for PACIFIC PHARMA across all therapeutic areas, from ClinicalTrials.gov.
Pro Intelligence Preview
Deep insights for investors and analysts
Revenue Insights
- • Top drug revenue breakdown
- • Drug-level revenue analysis
Trial Catalysts
- • Cardiovascular pipeline focus
- • Phase 3 readout tracking
Patent Risk
- • Patent expiration timeline
- • Revenue at risk analysis
Compare Companies
- • Side-by-side pipeline analysis
- • Revenue & market share comparison
Execution Intelligence
- • Phase 3: 0/1 completed
- • Speed: N/A months avg
Revenue forecasts • Trial milestones • Patent risk modeling
Active (0)
Discontinued (0)
Company Info
- First Approval
- 1997-03-25
- Latest
- 2020-04-03
- Applications
- 2
How We Calculate These Metrics
Execution Quality Score
Measures trial completion rates weighted by phase importance. Phase 3 trials count 4x more than Phase 1 because late-stage completion is harder and more valuable.
What counts as "completed": A trial that reached its planned endpoint and reported results. Trials that were terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted as completed—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.
- Excellent (80%+): Top-tier execution, most trials reach planned endpoints
- Good (60-79%): Strong execution with occasional early terminations
- Fair (40-59%): Average execution, notable rate of terminated/withdrawn trials
- Needs Improvement (under 40%): High termination rates, execution challenges