SHIONOGI
SpecialtySHIONOGI is a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on Infectious Disease, Metabolic, Gastroenterology. Key products include FETROJA.
FDA Novel Drug Designations
(2017-2019)SHIONOGI at a Glance
- Strong track record with 82% execution quality across 59 trials
- Fast trial execution (12 months median completion)
SHIONOGI's Key Drugs
SHIONOGI's core commercial portfolio centers on FETROJA, RADICAVA ORS, spanning Infectious Disease and Metabolic — its most strategically important drugs approved in the last 15 years.
SHIONOGI's Recent FDA Approvals
New NDA/BLA approvals for SHIONOGI over the last two years — novel drugs only, excluding generics and label supplements.
SHIONOGI's Therapeutic Areas
SHIONOGI's approved drugs and pipeline span 5 therapeutic areas, led by Infectious Disease and Metabolic, across 0 biologic and 2 small-molecule drugs. Weighted by commercial stage — approved drugs count most, then late-stage trials.
SHIONOGI's Top Competitors
SHIONOGI's closest competitors by therapeutic-area and drug-target overlap include Baxter, Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer. Ranked by overlap in therapeutic areas and drug targets across approved drugs and pipeline.
SHIONOGI Pipeline Snapshot
SHIONOGI has 22 active clinical programs from ClinicalTrials.gov — 3 Phase 3, 11 Phase 2 and 8 Phase 1.
Pro Intelligence Preview
Deep insights for investors and analysts
Revenue Insights
- • FETROJA leads revenue
- • 2 key drugs tracked
Trial Catalysts
- • Infectious Disease pipeline focus
- • Phase 3 readout tracking
Patent Risk
- • Patent expiration timeline
- • Revenue at risk analysis
Compare Companies
- • Side-by-side pipeline analysis
- • Revenue & market share comparison
Execution Intelligence
- • Phase 3: 15/16 completed
- • Speed: 12 months avg
Revenue forecasts • Trial milestones • Patent risk modeling
Active (2)
Discontinued (1)
Company Info
- First Approval
- 1993-09-09
- Latest
- 2025-06-06
- Applications
- 10
How We Calculate These Metrics
Execution Quality Score
Measures trial completion rates weighted by phase importance. Phase 3 trials count 4x more than Phase 1 because late-stage completion is harder and more valuable.
What counts as "completed": A trial that reached its planned endpoint and reported results. Trials that were terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted as completed—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.
- Excellent (80%+): Top-tier execution, most trials reach planned endpoints
- Good (60-79%): Strong execution with occasional early terminations
- Fair (40-59%): Average execution, notable rate of terminated/withdrawn trials
- Needs Improvement (under 40%): High termination rates, execution challenges