TheraRadar
← Back
Data updated: Jun 28, 2026

USWM CT, LLC

Biotech
OncologyGastroenterology Execution: Needs Improvement

USWM CT, LLC is a biotechnology company focused on Oncology, Gastroenterology. Key products include tecelra.

2024
Since
1
Drugs
-
Trials
1
New Drugs (2yr)
Modality:
1 Biologics

USWM CT, LLC's Key Drugs

USWM CT, LLC's core commercial portfolio centers on tecelra, spanning Oncology and Gastroenterology — its most strategically important drugs approved in the last 15 years.

USWM CT, LLC's Recent FDA Approvals

USWM CT, LLC secured 1 new FDA approval for novel drugs (NDA/BLA) in the last two years.

USWM CT, LLC's Therapeutic Areas

USWM CT, LLC's approved drugs and pipeline span 2 therapeutic areas, led by Oncology and Gastroenterology, across 1 biologic and 0 small-molecule drugs. Weighted by commercial stage — approved drugs count most, then late-stage trials.

Oncology 86%
0 drugs Phase 2: 4 Phase 1: 4
Gastroenterology 14%
0 drugs Phase 1: 2

USWM CT, LLC's Top Competitors

USWM CT, LLC's closest competitors by therapeutic-area and drug-target overlap include Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Takeda. Ranked by overlap in therapeutic areas and drug targets across approved drugs and pipeline.

USWM CT, LLC Pipeline Snapshot

USWM CT, LLC has 10 active clinical programs from ClinicalTrials.gov — 0 Phase 3, 4 Phase 2 and 6 Phase 1.

0
Phase 3
4
Phase 2
6
Phase 1

Pro Intelligence Preview

Deep insights for investors and analysts

Revenue Insights

  • tecelra leads revenue
  • Drug-level revenue analysis

Trial Catalysts

  • Oncology pipeline focus
  • Phase 3 readout tracking

Patent Risk

  • Patent expiration timeline
  • Revenue at risk analysis

Compare Companies

  • Side-by-side pipeline analysis
  • Revenue & market share comparison

Execution Intelligence

  • Phase 3: 0/0 completed
  • Speed: N/A months avg
Unlock Full Intelligence

Revenue forecasts • Trial milestones • Patent risk modeling

How We Calculate These Metrics

Execution Quality Score

Measures trial completion rates weighted by phase importance. Phase 3 trials count 4x more than Phase 1 because late-stage completion is harder and more valuable.

What counts as "completed": A trial that reached its planned endpoint and reported results. Trials that were terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted as completed—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.

  • Excellent (80%+): Top-tier execution, most trials reach planned endpoints
  • Good (60-79%): Strong execution with occasional early terminations
  • Fair (40-59%): Average execution, notable rate of terminated/withdrawn trials
  • Needs Improvement (under 40%): High termination rates, execution challenges