TheraRadar
← Back
Data updated: Jun 28, 2026

Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS INC

Biotech
ImmunologyOncologyDermatology Execution: Needs Improvement

Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS INC is a biotechnology company focused on Immunology, Oncology, Dermatology.

2020
Since
1
Drugs
-
Trials
0
New Drugs (2yr)

FDA Novel Drug Designations

(2020)
1 Novel 1 Orphan 1 Breakthrough 1 Accelerated 1 Priority Review
See 1 novel approval →
2020 DANYELZA (NAXITAMAB-GQGK) Orphan · Breakthrough · Priority Review · Accelerated

Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS INC at a Glance

  • Fast trial execution (11 months median completion)

Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS INC's Key Drugs

Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS INC's core commercial portfolio centers on DANYELZA, spanning Immunology and Oncology — its most strategically important drugs approved in the last 15 years.

Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS INC's Recent FDA Approvals

New NDA/BLA approvals for Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS INC over the last two years — novel drugs only, excluding generics and label supplements.

No recent approvals

Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS INC's Therapeutic Areas

Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS INC's approved drugs and pipeline span 3 therapeutic areas, led by Immunology and Oncology. Weighted by commercial stage — approved drugs count most, then late-stage trials.

Immunology 84%
0 drugs Phase 3: 7 Phase 2: 7
Oncology 12%
0 drugs Phase 1: 6
Dermatology 4%
0 drugs Phase 2: 1

Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS INC's Top Competitors

Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS INC's closest competitors by therapeutic-area and drug-target overlap include Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and PF PRISM CV. Ranked by overlap in therapeutic areas and drug targets across approved drugs and pipeline.

Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS INC Pipeline Snapshot

Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS INC has 21 active clinical programs from ClinicalTrials.gov — 7 Phase 3, 8 Phase 2 and 6 Phase 1.

7
Phase 3
8
Phase 2
6
Phase 1

Pro Intelligence Preview

Deep insights for investors and analysts

Revenue Insights

  • DANYELZA leads revenue
  • Drug-level revenue analysis
View revenue breakdown →

Trial Catalysts

  • Immunology pipeline focus
  • Phase 3 readout tracking
View full pipeline →

Patent Risk

  • Patent expiration timeline
  • Revenue at risk analysis
View patent timeline →

Compare Companies

  • Side-by-side pipeline analysis
  • Revenue & market share comparison
Compare with competitor →

Execution Intelligence

  • Phase 3: 0/0 completed
  • Speed: 11 months avg
Unlock Full Intelligence

Revenue forecasts • Trial milestones • Patent risk modeling

How We Calculate These Metrics

Execution Quality Score

Measures trial completion rates weighted by phase importance. Phase 3 trials count 4x more than Phase 1 because late-stage completion is harder and more valuable.

What counts as "completed": A trial that reached its planned endpoint and reported results. Trials that were terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted as completed—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.

  • Excellent (80%+): Top-tier execution, most trials reach planned endpoints
  • Good (60-79%): Strong execution with occasional early terminations
  • Fair (40-59%): Average execution, notable rate of terminated/withdrawn trials
  • Needs Improvement (under 40%): High termination rates, execution challenges