TheraRadar
← Back
Data updated: Jun 28, 2026

AbbVie

ABBV Big Pharma

Immunology and oncology specialist spun from Abbott in 2013. Humira successor portfolio includes Skyrizi and Rinvoq. Expanded into aesthetics via Allergan acquisition.

$56.3B
Revenue (2024)
$310.0B
Market Cap
-
Trials
4
New Drugs (2yr)
Modality:
53 Small Molecules 5 Biologics

FDA Novel Drug Designations

(2016-2025)
8 Novel 3 First-in-Class 1 Orphan 3 Breakthrough 2 Accelerated 4 Priority Review 2 Fast Track
See 8 novel approvals →
2025 EMRELIS (TELISOTUZUMAB VEDOTIN-TLLV) First-in-Class · Breakthrough · Priority Review · Accelerated
2021 QULIPTA (ATOGEPANT)
2019 SKYRIZI (RISANKIZUMAB-RZAA)
2019 UBRELVY (UBROGEPANT)
2019 RINVOQ (UPADACITINIB)
2018 ORILISSA (ELAGOLIX SODIUM) First-in-Class · Priority Review
2017 MAVYRET (GLECAPREVIR) Breakthrough · Priority Review · Fast Track
2016 VENCLEXTA (VENETOCLAX) First-in-Class · Orphan · Breakthrough · Priority Review · Accelerated · Fast Track

AbbVie at a Glance

  • Leading 6 drug targets across portfolio
  • Fast trial execution (25 months median completion)

Upcoming FDA Decisions

Full Calendar →
Jul 26, 2026 — Tavapadon
18d
Jul 30, 2026 — Pivekimab sunirine (PVEK)

AbbVie's Therapeutic Areas

AbbVie's approved drugs and pipeline span 5 therapeutic areas, led by Immunology and Oncology, across 5 biologic and 53 small-molecule drugs. Weighted by commercial stage — approved drugs count most, then late-stage trials.

Immunology 26%
6 drugs Phase 3: 76 Phase 2: 45 Phase 1: 31
Oncology 22%
4 drugs Phase 3: 30 Phase 2: 52 Phase 1: 133
Infectious Disease 18%
7 drugs Phase 3: 55 Phase 2: 28 Phase 1: 9
Neurology 17%
8 drugs Phase 3: 47 Phase 2: 24 Phase 1: 22
Ophthalmology 17%
7 drugs Phase 3: 40 Phase 2: 23 Phase 1: 49

AbbVie's Top Competitors

AbbVie's closest competitors by therapeutic-area and drug-target overlap include Pfizer, Roche, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Ranked by overlap in therapeutic areas and drug targets across approved drugs and pipeline.

AbbVie Pipeline Snapshot

AbbVie has 664 active clinical programs from ClinicalTrials.gov — 248 Phase 3, 172 Phase 2 and 244 Phase 1.

248
Phase 3
172
Phase 2
244
Phase 1

Phase 3 Readout Calendar Pro

8 Phase 3 trials with confidence-graded primary completion dates.

Full calendar →
Q3 2026
Upadacitinib
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Estimated · fresh NCT05814627
Q3 2026
Bimatoprost SR
Open-Angle Glaucoma
Estimated · aging NCT03891446
Q3 2026
Upadacitinib 15mg Dose
Atopic Dermatitis
Estimated · fresh NCT06389136
Unlock 5 more readouts with confidence-graded estimates
Upgrade to Pro

Anchored on CT.gov primary completion date. Topline announcements typically precede this by 3–9 months. Confidence labels combine date type (ACTUAL/ESTIMATED) with last-update freshness.

Pro Intelligence Preview

Deep insights for investors and analysts

Revenue Insights

  • SKYRIZI leads revenue
  • 5 key drugs tracked
View revenue breakdown →

Trial Catalysts

  • Immunology pipeline focus
  • 8 Phase 3 readouts tracked
View readout calendar →

Patent Risk

  • Patent expiration timeline
  • Revenue at risk analysis
View patent timeline →

Compare Companies

  • Side-by-side pipeline analysis
  • Revenue & market share comparison
Compare with competitor →

Execution Intelligence

  • Phase 3: 168/252 completed
  • Speed: 25 months avg
Unlock Full Intelligence

Revenue forecasts • Trial milestones • Patent risk modeling

How We Calculate These Metrics

Execution Quality Score

Measures trial completion rates weighted by phase importance. Phase 3 trials count 4x more than Phase 1 because late-stage completion is harder and more valuable.

What counts as "completed": A trial that reached its planned endpoint and reported results. Trials that were terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted as completed—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.

  • Excellent (80%+): Top-tier execution, most trials reach planned endpoints
  • Good (60-79%): Strong execution with occasional early terminations
  • Fair (40-59%): Average execution, notable rate of terminated/withdrawn trials
  • Needs Improvement (under 40%): High termination rates, execution challenges