RHODES
GenericsRHODES is a generic drug manufacturer focused on Ophthalmology.
RHODES at a Glance
- Strong track record with 100% execution quality across 10 trials
- Fast trial execution (13 months median completion)
RHODES's Key Drugs
RHODES's key approved drugs from the last 15 years (excludes generics, biosimilars and IV formulations).
RHODES's Recent FDA Approvals
New NDA/BLA approvals for RHODES over the last two years — novel drugs only, excluding generics and label supplements.
RHODES's Therapeutic Areas
RHODES's approved drugs and pipeline span 1 therapeutic area, led by Ophthalmology. Weighted by commercial stage — approved drugs count most, then late-stage trials.
RHODES's Top Competitors
RHODES's closest competitors by therapeutic-area and drug-target overlap include Novartis, AbbVie, and OTSUKA ICU MEDCL. Ranked by overlap in therapeutic areas and drug targets across approved drugs and pipeline.
RHODES Pipeline Snapshot
RHODES has 1 active clinical program from ClinicalTrials.gov — 0 Phase 3, 0 Phase 2 and 1 Phase 1.
Pro Intelligence Preview
Deep insights for investors and analysts
Revenue Insights
- • Top drug revenue breakdown
- • Drug-level revenue analysis
Trial Catalysts
- • Ophthalmology pipeline focus
- • Phase 3 readout tracking
Patent Risk
- • Patent expiration timeline
- • Revenue at risk analysis
Compare Companies
- • Side-by-side pipeline analysis
- • Revenue & market share comparison
Execution Intelligence
- • Phase 3: 7/7 completed
- • Speed: 13 months avg
Revenue forecasts • Trial milestones • Patent risk modeling
Active (0)
Discontinued (0)
Company Info
- First Approval
- 2008-06-27
- Latest
- 2011-08-31
- Applications
- 1
How We Calculate These Metrics
Execution Quality Score
Measures trial completion rates weighted by phase importance. Phase 3 trials count 4x more than Phase 1 because late-stage completion is harder and more valuable.
What counts as "completed": A trial that reached its planned endpoint and reported results. Trials that were terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted as completed—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.
- Excellent (80%+): Top-tier execution, most trials reach planned endpoints
- Good (60-79%): Strong execution with occasional early terminations
- Fair (40-59%): Average execution, notable rate of terminated/withdrawn trials
- Needs Improvement (under 40%): High termination rates, execution challenges