TheraRadar
← Back
Data updated: Jun 28, 2026

WISCONSIN

Generics
OncologyNeurology Execution: Fair

WISCONSIN is a generic drug manufacturer focused on Oncology, Neurology.

2013
Since
2
Drugs
-
Trials
0
New Drugs (2yr)
Modality:
1 Small Molecules

WISCONSIN at a Glance

  • Growing R&D activity with 38 trials in last 2 years
  • Fast trial execution (34 months median completion)

WISCONSIN's Key Drugs

WISCONSIN's key approved drugs from the last 15 years (excludes generics, biosimilars and IV formulations).

No active drugs

WISCONSIN's Recent FDA Approvals

New NDA/BLA approvals for WISCONSIN over the last two years — novel drugs only, excluding generics and label supplements.

No recent approvals

WISCONSIN's Therapeutic Areas

WISCONSIN's approved drugs and pipeline span 2 therapeutic areas, led by Oncology and Neurology, across 0 biologic and 1 small-molecule drug. Weighted by commercial stage — approved drugs count most, then late-stage trials.

Oncology 50%
1 drugs
Neurology 50%
1 drugs

WISCONSIN's Top Competitors

WISCONSIN's closest competitors by therapeutic-area and drug-target overlap include Pfizer, AbbVie, and Eli Lilly. Ranked by overlap in therapeutic areas and drug targets across approved drugs and pipeline.

WISCONSIN Pipeline Snapshot

Active clinical trials for WISCONSIN across all therapeutic areas, from ClinicalTrials.gov.

No active pipeline data available

Pro Intelligence Preview

Deep insights for investors and analysts

Revenue Insights

  • Top drug revenue breakdown
  • Drug-level revenue analysis

Trial Catalysts

  • Oncology pipeline focus
  • Phase 3 readout tracking

Patent Risk

  • Patent expiration timeline
  • Revenue at risk analysis

Compare Companies

  • Side-by-side pipeline analysis
  • Revenue & market share comparison

Execution Intelligence

  • Phase 3: 10/12 completed
  • Speed: 34 months avg
Unlock Full Intelligence

Revenue forecasts • Trial milestones • Patent risk modeling

How We Calculate These Metrics

Execution Quality Score

Measures trial completion rates weighted by phase importance. Phase 3 trials count 4x more than Phase 1 because late-stage completion is harder and more valuable.

What counts as "completed": A trial that reached its planned endpoint and reported results. Trials that were terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted as completed—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.

  • Excellent (80%+): Top-tier execution, most trials reach planned endpoints
  • Good (60-79%): Strong execution with occasional early terminations
  • Fair (40-59%): Average execution, notable rate of terminated/withdrawn trials
  • Needs Improvement (under 40%): High termination rates, execution challenges